This chapter on inquiry units seemed so fitting after the
discussion we had in class Tuesday with Mr. Laplante. He specifically mentioned how the trend in 21st
Century education is collaboration and communication. Inquiry units create
opportunities for students to be involved in both of those. I especially like
the key points of authentic activities, and student choice.
This is also in line with what I’ve been learning in my
middle level class about literacy in the content and especially writing
assignment and how to make sure students are engaged in activities that are
most closely related to real –life activities in that field. Additionally, this
idea of student choice is something that we’ve seen over and over again in the
promotion of RAFT assignments. One thing that they pointed out here which
hasn’t been discussed in great detail in class, is giving the choice of final
assessment. Allowing students to take the information they’ve gathered and use
output which is most comfortable or challenging for them or most appropriate
for the content they are learning.
I have one idea I’m struggling with or at least wondering
about from this chapter. They reiterated
more than once the idea of planning the unit of study or topic and then
aligning it with the standards which will apply. This feels backwards to everything we’ve been
learning about setting the intention of the lesson first, looking at the
standards first and then creating the activity. I’m wondering why they decided
to plan the unit then apply the standards and if there’s a way to pick the
standards you want to focus on first then plan the unit. I’m also thinking in terms of UbD, is
planning the topic first the same thing as building backwards from the big idea
down? Or would you need an enduring concept, then the topics, then the
standards? These are some of the technical planning pieces I’m trying to place
in my head still.
From the chapter on struggling readers, this idea of not
being able to create the mental picture while reading is what stands out to me
the most. I am an avid reader and when I reflect on things I did not enjoy
reading in the past (and the list is pretty short) more times than not it was
because I could not create those mental images because I was missing something
which would’ve allowed me to engage with the text. This may have been attention
span, prior knowledge, motivation and personal enjoyment of the topic, or the
reading level was not the right one for me. Imaging is a tool I recently
covered in my SPED class that I think is really important o explicitly teach
and for me personally was something I almost overlooked. Taking the time as a during reading activity
to stop and teach students to physically draw what is happening, or turn and
describe it to their partner. I also
heard of an example in my SPED class where the teacher drew a picture for what
they read that day and then each day as they finished the text the students added
significant pieces until they had a book mural. If we do these activities and
explicitly teach how to visualize the reading, eventually it will become second
nature for our students and will be another tool we’ve allowed them access to
be able to make reading materials easier.
In
addition other tools such as front-loading the text and giving any prior
knowledge they may need before they even enter the text can afford them success
right from the beginning. Advance
organizers are another way that we can grab their attention, activate prior
knowledge students already have, and make connections which will help students
have a “file” to put the new material in as they read.
I’m wondering about this idea that reaching struggling
students works best if you can build trust with them first, and show them this
experience will be different from all their previous ones. How and when is it
appropriate to have these conversations to get to know why are students are
struggling or have lost their confidence in their literacy of our particular
content? I’m wondering how to push just enough to get to the specific problem
but not so much the student feels threatened. I’m also wondering how much
should be done up front at the beginning of a school year as you get to know your
students and how much of this is something that will fluctuate and change and
be a cyclical process that we work on throughout the
year.
I had the very same question when reading chapter 10. It does seem like we are coming up with this awesome inquiry idea and then going "hmm what standards does this meet?". The way the book described it did not appear to go along with all we learned about UbD either. Maybe I am missing the backwards part of it as well, but shouldn't it be more effective to start from gathering a group of related standards then crafting our great project from our objectives/goal?
ReplyDeleteMichela - I couldn't agree more about the importance of understanding that some students may need help in learning how to picture things that they read. I think as an English teacher you will do a great job implementing this as an exercise.
ReplyDeleteHi Michela, I really enjoyed reading your post because of how many connections you made- ranging from your middle level course, your SPED course, to Mr. Laplante's discussion with the class. I'm just as curious about many of your questions, for example, one question you had regarding the textbook and our class discussions on creating the "big idea" then applying the standards to applying the standards to only work on the big idea afterwards. Also, would UbD apply to that? You really get in depth with applying your reading to concerns as a future teacher as well as connecting it to your other courses, I think this type of reflecting will only serve you well when you start your career as an educator :) amazing job!
ReplyDeleteMichela,
ReplyDeleteI was definitely struggling with the same idea while reading chapter 10. I totally agree with you when you the idea of planning a unit and then aligning it to the standards goes against everything we learned about regarding UbD. I also wrote about this contradiction, I guess you would call it. I can see where D&Z was trying to go with this example, but I like the concept of UbD a lot better. I am one of those people that need to know where I am going. This idea of choosing the standard last seems a bit irresponsible, especially such an integral part of the curriculum is meeting these standards.